Tuesday, April 11, 2006
People are exercising their free speech rights: It is a beautiful thing
These pesky First Amendment guidelines about sexual orientation in the public schools just keep causing "trouble." Here is a two-part series with a bit of a fuss between Chad Thompson/me and Linda Harvey. I wonder if anyone will ever implement them?
Comments:
<< Home
Good for you. If AgapePress says you "caved in", it probably means "stood up for something right."
I know you're not necessarily on the side of Gay-Straight Alliances, but a friend of mine recently told me she decided to be the advisor for one in her high school because of my high school experience being closeted. It was a nice feeling, knowing that other kids will benefit in having a safe space that I didn't.
I know you're not necessarily on the side of Gay-Straight Alliances, but a friend of mine recently told me she decided to be the advisor for one in her high school because of my high school experience being closeted. It was a nice feeling, knowing that other kids will benefit in having a safe space that I didn't.
This, echoing CK, from a 90 year old grandmother:
People will know you by the company you keep and the enemies you make.
They don't make pithy proverbs like they used to...
People will know you by the company you keep and the enemies you make.
They don't make pithy proverbs like they used to...
In response to regular assaults from her little brother who doesn't seem to like wearing pants, my daughter has a pithy proverb: Never surrender to someone who is not wearing pants.
I'm not sure that's a proverb.
More like a rule of public life.
Particularly in a corporate environment. Or a college. Of the Oval Office.
And we've never met a little kid yet who didn't enjoy emerging from their bath and go running off until chased down and re-pant-ed (to squeals, screams and laughter). Cute :)
More like a rule of public life.
Particularly in a corporate environment. Or a college. Of the Oval Office.
And we've never met a little kid yet who didn't enjoy emerging from their bath and go running off until chased down and re-pant-ed (to squeals, screams and laughter). Cute :)
Since I consider Chad a friend chatting publicly about his private life is not something I want to do. Email him privately, maybe he will discuss this with you, maybe he won't.
As far as believing him, sure I do. I believe people who say that this approach didn't work for them, why wouldn't I believe those who say it was helpful?
As far as believing him, sure I do. I believe people who say that this approach didn't work for them, why wouldn't I believe those who say it was helpful?
Rob,
It probably would be a good idea to email Chad, if you wish. He does say he's willing to take such emails.
That said: Chad has had a deal to say in public. Leaving aside the fact Chad has never "done" anything gay -- he basically exgayed himself in adolescence -- his "living as a heterosexual" appears less than one would expect of either a straight or bisexual man. Try [1] and [2] for example (both chosen because they are so generous with Chad).
As for taking his words on trust alone: personally, no. Not since some rather astounding exchanges at ExGayWatch, repeated here at Warren's blog. I still cannot image what possessed him in, of all places, somewhere people were more than likely to be familiar with certain info. [3] [4] and [5].
Those exchanges are particularly interesting given that the falsehoods were not only plainly obvious, but also completely unnecessary. For me it raises concerns about what Chad would be prepared to say in less knowledgeable or challenging forums. For whatever reason, or even without one.
None of this alters, of course, Chad's right to live anyway he wants, aspire to anything he wants or claim anything he wants. :)
It probably would be a good idea to email Chad, if you wish. He does say he's willing to take such emails.
That said: Chad has had a deal to say in public. Leaving aside the fact Chad has never "done" anything gay -- he basically exgayed himself in adolescence -- his "living as a heterosexual" appears less than one would expect of either a straight or bisexual man. Try [1] and [2] for example (both chosen because they are so generous with Chad).
As for taking his words on trust alone: personally, no. Not since some rather astounding exchanges at ExGayWatch, repeated here at Warren's blog. I still cannot image what possessed him in, of all places, somewhere people were more than likely to be familiar with certain info. [3] [4] and [5].
Those exchanges are particularly interesting given that the falsehoods were not only plainly obvious, but also completely unnecessary. For me it raises concerns about what Chad would be prepared to say in less knowledgeable or challenging forums. For whatever reason, or even without one.
None of this alters, of course, Chad's right to live anyway he wants, aspire to anything he wants or claim anything he wants. :)
Sorry Rob -- "will not" or "has not"?
Big diff. :)
Chad may not be online at the moment. If you've followed his blog etc, this happens from time to time. All part of running a busy exgay francise I guess.
In any case, the particular use of words in the message -- pHelps(sic) or Thompson -- doesn't cut much ice with us. (One of us attempts NOT to do that sort of "re-framing" for a living!)
It almost like watching a "new" ad for Coke. yep, same babes jumping on beach. same dudes snowboarding. Snazzy new song and slogan.
Nope. It's always ALWAYS been always about getting people to guzzle down more of that brown, sugared, fizzy water.
Yeah, right, it's still Coke.
Big diff. :)
Chad may not be online at the moment. If you've followed his blog etc, this happens from time to time. All part of running a busy exgay francise I guess.
In any case, the particular use of words in the message -- pHelps(sic) or Thompson -- doesn't cut much ice with us. (One of us attempts NOT to do that sort of "re-framing" for a living!)
It almost like watching a "new" ad for Coke. yep, same babes jumping on beach. same dudes snowboarding. Snazzy new song and slogan.
Nope. It's always ALWAYS been always about getting people to guzzle down more of that brown, sugared, fizzy water.
Yeah, right, it's still Coke.
ex-gay underwear???
Rob, you're not "going all Mormon" on us are you :)
-------------------
BTW: (unrelated tip for free) try Manila for frantic undergarment shopping blowout.
Makati. 8? mega-shopping malls face each other. Much of said product is sewn in Manila and exported under expensive labels.
All you need to tolerate is two charming shop girls (per shopper) who run ahead and un-box stuff if you even so much as roll your eyes that direction. No dear, I DO NOT want that ugly leopard-print thong thing... (do I look like a 60 year old German man??? Don't answer that...)
And the prices! We threw out all our skanky old undies from 3 months of backbacking in Vietnam and came home with a squillion 2(x)ist blah blah blah. The local "Bench" brand is very good value too. Very good.
Loved Manila! Charming, steaming, heaving, crazy Asia. The locals are delightful.
Ha! And Warren never guessed his blog would ever be used to promote excessive use of "foundation garments" :)
Rob, you're not "going all Mormon" on us are you :)
-------------------
BTW: (unrelated tip for free) try Manila for frantic undergarment shopping blowout.
Makati. 8? mega-shopping malls face each other. Much of said product is sewn in Manila and exported under expensive labels.
All you need to tolerate is two charming shop girls (per shopper) who run ahead and un-box stuff if you even so much as roll your eyes that direction. No dear, I DO NOT want that ugly leopard-print thong thing... (do I look like a 60 year old German man??? Don't answer that...)
And the prices! We threw out all our skanky old undies from 3 months of backbacking in Vietnam and came home with a squillion 2(x)ist blah blah blah. The local "Bench" brand is very good value too. Very good.
Loved Manila! Charming, steaming, heaving, crazy Asia. The locals are delightful.
Ha! And Warren never guessed his blog would ever be used to promote excessive use of "foundation garments" :)
Hey, just a thought as I watch this exchange. I don't know the content of Rob's email to Chad, or Chad's schedule, so I'm going onto a hypothetical limb here...
But would you want to answer that kind of question out of the blue from a stranger? I understand that by being a representative of the ex-gay movement, he is putting himself in the spotlight. Still, I think he might want to wait, have a conversation with you first, and then make sure that you both have an appropriate context to put his yes or no answer into.
But would you want to answer that kind of question out of the blue from a stranger? I understand that by being a representative of the ex-gay movement, he is putting himself in the spotlight. Still, I think he might want to wait, have a conversation with you first, and then make sure that you both have an appropriate context to put his yes or no answer into.
Rob,
some folks are content if they can simply learn to live celibate. That may be enough "change" for them.
I wish ex-gay groups were a bit more honest about what they mean by "change" (ok, a lot more honest) and not hide behind vague terms. If they went on TV and said "I don't have sex" that wouldn't make very good television so they say "I'm ex-gay" or "a former homosexual" or "I've changed" and let the audience believe that they've gone from a homosexual orientation to a heterosexual orientation.
I hate the deceit. But if that kind of change is enough for Chad, that's fine with me - as long as he gives full disclosure.
some folks are content if they can simply learn to live celibate. That may be enough "change" for them.
I wish ex-gay groups were a bit more honest about what they mean by "change" (ok, a lot more honest) and not hide behind vague terms. If they went on TV and said "I don't have sex" that wouldn't make very good television so they say "I'm ex-gay" or "a former homosexual" or "I've changed" and let the audience believe that they've gone from a homosexual orientation to a heterosexual orientation.
I hate the deceit. But if that kind of change is enough for Chad, that's fine with me - as long as he gives full disclosure.
Ck - I lean your direction on this. I get all kinds of emails from people asking personal questions and I don't answer. I do know Chad is writing a second book and he may address some of these issues in that project.
Post a Comment
<< Home